Hello
My feeling on this is that the divide is more of a waking up and a backlash by reformed evangelicals to the new perspective on Paul and that this perspective is now on the wane. It probably depends on where you are in the world. It's difficult to see reformed evangelical doctrine loosing out because it has the history and tradition and Christians feel secure in tradition. I also think that there are differences with classic Christadelphianism in the area of Israel and that the newer evangelical thinking here hasn't sufficiently thought through the significance of AD70 for its understanding of what Jesus and the apostles were doing. They may have rightly rejected supercessionism but what they have put in its place isn't right. But I do think that this 'split' is where the interface is for Christadelphians doing theology; it is just that they are few and the danger is that people generally won't have Christadelphian writing to use and just read the evangelical stuff. It is a regretable irony that as evangelicals have written more on Israel focused theology in the NT that Christadelphians have concentrated on printing more devotional, introductory and sentimental writing instead of developing their heritage.
A
andrewneileen's Content
There have been 3 items by andrewneileen (Search limited from 04-May 23)